Colon to Rectum

Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;7(7):648–57

Matsuoka K, Watanabe M, Ohmori T, Nakajima K, Ishida T, Ishiguro Y, Kanke K, Kobayashi K, Hirai F, Watanabe K, Mizusawa H, Kishida S, Miura Y, Ohta A, Kajioka T, Hibi T; AJM300 Study Group

AJM300 (carotegrast methyl), an oral antagonist of α4-integrin, as induction therapy for patients with moderately active ulcerative colitis: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study


Background: AJM300 is an oral, small-molecule α4-integrin antagonist. The authors assessed the efficacy and safety of AJM300 in patients with moderately active ulcerative colitis.
Methods: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study consisted of 2 phases: a treatment phase and an open-label retreatment phase. The study was done at 82 hospitals and clinics in Japan. Patients with a Mayo Clinic score of 6–10, endoscopic subscore ≥ 2, rectal bleeding subscore ≥ 1, and an inadequate response or intolerance to mesalazine were enrolled. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) via a website to either AJM300 (960 mg) or placebo by the minimization method, which was adjusted centrally by dynamic assignment against the Mayo Clinic score (≥ 6 to ≤ 7, ≥ 8 to ≤ 10 points), any use of corticosteroids, anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha antibody, or immunosuppressants during the disease-active period (yes vs. no), duration of induction therapy until randomization (< 4 weeks vs. ≥ 4 weeks) as the minimization factors. Patients, investigators, site staff, assessors, and the sponsor were masked to treatment assignments. The study drug was administered orally, 3 times daily, for 8 weeks, and continued for up to 24 weeks if endoscopic remission was not achieved or rectal bleeding did not stop. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with a clinical response at week 8, and was analyzed in the full analysis set. Clinical response was defined as a reduction in Mayo Clinic score ≥ 30% and ≥ 3, a reduction in rectal bleeding score ≥ 1 or rectal bleeding subscore ≤ 1, and an endoscopic subscore ≤ 1 at week 8.
Findings: Between June 6, 2018, and July 22, 2020, 203 patients were randomly assigned to AJM300 (n = 102) or placebo (n = 101). At week 8, 46 patients (45%) in the AJM300 group and 21 patients (21%) in the placebo group had a clinical response (odds ratio = 3.30, 95% confidence interval: 1.73–6.29; p = 0.00028). During the 8-week treatment and 16-week extension treatment periods, adverse events (AEs) occurred in 39 of 101 patients (39%) in the placebo group and 39 of 102 patients (38%) in the AJM300 group. No difference in the incidence of AEs between groups or after repeated administration of AJM300 was found. The most common AE was nasopharyngitis (11/101 patients [11%] in the placebo group and 10/102 patients [10%] in the AJM300 group). The most common treatment-related AE was also nasopharyngitis (4/101 patients [4%] in the placebo group and 3/102 patients [3%] in the AJM300 group). Most AEs were mild-to-moderate in severity. No deaths were reported. A serious AE was reported in the AJM300 group (1 patient with anal abscess), but this was judged to be unrelated to study drug.

Interpretation: AJM300 was well tolerated and induced a clinical response in patients with moderately active ulcerative colitis who had an inadequate response or intolerance to mesalazine. AJM300 could be a novel induction therapy for the treatment of patients with moderately active ulcerative colitis.

Prof. Dr. M. Watanabe, Advanced Research Institute and Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan,
E-Mail: mamoru.gast@tmd.ac.jp

DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(22)00022-x

Back to overview

this could be of interest:

Upadacitinib as induction and maintenance therapy for moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: Results from 3 phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized trials

Lancet. 2022;399(10341):2113–28

Oral fluconazole therapy in patients with active ulcerative colitis who have detectable Candida in the stool: A double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial

J Clin Gastroenterol. 2022;56(8):705–11

More articles on the topic