Liver and Bile

Lancet. 2023;402(10415):1835–47

Qin S, Chen M, Cheng AL, Kaseb AO, Kudo M, Lee HC, Yopp AC, Zhou J, Wang L, Wen X, Heo J, Tak WY, Nakamura S, Numata K, Uguen T, Hsiehchen D, Cha E, Hack SP, Lian Q, Ma N, Spahn JH, Wang Y, Wu C, Chow PKH; IMbrave050 investigators

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus active surveillance in patients with resected or ablated high-risk hepatocellular carcinoma (IMbrave050): A randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 trial


Background: No adjuvant treatment has been established for patients who remain at high risk for hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after curative-intent resection or ablation. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of adjuvant atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus active surveillance in patients with high-risk hepatocellular carcinoma.
Methods: In the global, open-label, phase 3 IMbrave050 study, adult patients with high-risk surgically resected or ablated hepatocellular carcinoma were recruited from 134 hospitals and medical centers in 26 countries in 4 WHO regions (European region, region of the Americas, South-East Asia region, and Western Pacific region). Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio via an interactive voice-web response system using permuted blocks, using a block size of 4, to receive intravenous 1200 mg atezolizumab plus 15 mg/kg bevacizumab every 3 weeks for 17 cycles (12 months) or to active surveillance. The primary end point was recurrence-free survival by independent review facility assessment in the intention-to-treat population.
Findings: The intention-to-treat population included 668 patients randomly assigned between December 31, 2019, and November 25, 2021, to either atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (n = 334) or to active surveillance (n = 334). At the prespecified interim analysis (October 21, 2022), median duration of follow-up was 17.4 months (interquartile range, 13.9–22.1). Adjuvant atezolizumab plus bevacizumab was associated with significantly improved recurrence-free survival (median, not evaluable [NE] [95% confidence interval {CI}: 22.1–NE]) compared with active surveillance (median, NE [95% CI: 21.4–NE]; hazard ratio = 0.72 [adjusted 95% CI: 0.53–0.98]; p = 0.012). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 136 of 332 patients (41%) who received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and 44 of 330 patients (13%) in the active surveillance group. Grade 5 adverse events occurred in 6 patients (2%, 2 of which were treatment related) in the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group, and 1 patient (< 1%) in the active surveillance group. Both atezolizumab and bevacizumab were discontinued because of adverse events in 29 patients (9%) who received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab.

Interpretation: Among patients at high risk of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence following curative-intent resection or ablation, recurrence-free survival was improved in those who received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus active surveillance. To the authors’ knowledge, IMbrave050 is the first phase 3 study of adjuvant treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma to report positive results. However, longer follow-up for both recurrence-free and overall survival is needed to assess the benefit-risk profile more fully.

Prof. Dr. P.K.H. Chow, National Cancer Center, Singapore, Singapore, E-Mail: pierce.chow@duke-nus.edu.sg

DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)01796-8

Back to overview

this could be of interest:

Development, validation, and prognostic evaluation of a risk score for long-term liver-related outcomes in the general population: A multicohort study

Lancet. 2023;402(10406):988–96

Etiological cure prevents further decompensation and mortality in patients with cirrhosis with ascites as the single first decompensating event

Hepatology. 2023;78(4):1149–58

More articles on the topic