Colon to Rectum

JAMA. 2023;329(9):725−34

Zhang S, Chen B, Wang B, Chen H, Li Y, Cao Q, Zhong J, Shieh MJ, Ran Z, Tang T, Yang M, Xu B, Wang Q, Liu Y, Ma L, Wang X, Zhang N, Zhang S, Guo W, Huang L, Schreiber S, Chen M

Effect of induction therapy with olamkicept versus placebo on clinical response in patients with active ulcerative colitis: A randomized clinical trial


Importance: Olamkicept, a soluble gp130-Fc fusion protein, selectively inhibits interleukin 6 (IL-6) trans-signaling by binding the soluble IL-6 re-ceptor/IL-6 complex. It has anti-inflammatory activities in inflammatory murine models without immune suppression.
Objective: To assess the effect of olamkicept as induction therapy in patients with active ulcerative colitis.
Design, setting, and participants: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial of olamkicept in 91 adults with active ulcerative colitis (full Mayo score ≥ 5, rectal bleeding score ≥ 1, endoscopy score ≥ 2) and an inadequate response to conventional therapy. The study was conducted at 22 clinical study sites in East Asia. Patients were recruited beginning in February 2018. Final follow-up occurred in December 2020. Interventions: Eligible patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive a biweekly intravenous infusion of olamkicept 600 mg (n = 30) or 300 mg (n = 31) or placebo (n = 30) for 12 weeks.
Main outcomes and measures: The primary end point was clinical response at week 12 (defined as ≥ 3 and ≥ 30% decrease from baseline total Mayo score; range, 0−12 [worst] with ≥ 1 decrease and ≤ 1 in rectal bleeding [range, 0−3 {worst}]). There were 25 secondary efficacy outcomes, including clinical remission and mucosal healing at week 12.
Results: 91 patients (mean age, 41 years; 25 women [27.5%]) were randomized; 79 (86.8%) completed the trial. At week 12, more patients receiving olamkicept 600 mg (17/29 [58.6%]) or 300 mg (13/30 [43.3%]) achieved clinical response than placebo (10/29 [34.5%]), with adjusted difference versus placebo of 26.6% (90% confidence interval [CI]: 6.2−47.1%; p = 0.03) for 600 mg and 8.3% (90% CI: -12.6−29.1%; p = 0.52) for 300 mg. Among patients randomized to receive 600 mg olamkicept, 16 of 25 secondary outcomes were statistically significant compared with placebo. Among patients randomized to receive 300 mg, 6 of 25 secondary outcomes were statistically significant compared with placebo. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 53.3% (16/30) of patients receiving 600 mg olamkicept, 58.1% (18/31) receiving 300 mg olamkicept, and 50% (15/30) receiving placebo. The most common drug-related adverse events were bilirubin presence in the urine, hyperurice-mia, and increased aspartate aminotransferase levels, and all were more common in the olamkicept groups compared with placebo.

Conclusions and relevance: Among patients with active ulcerative colitis, biweekly infusion of olamkicept 600 mg, but not 300 mg, resulted in a greater likelihood of clinical response at 12 weeks compared with placebo. Further research is needed for replication and to assess longer-term efficacy and safety.

Prof. Dr. M. Chen, Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China,
E-Mail: chenminhu@mail.sysu.edu.cn

DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.1084

Back to overview

this could be of interest:

Guselkumab plus golimumab combination therapy versus guselkumab or golimumab monotherapy in patients with ulcerative colitis (VEGA): A randomized, double-blind, controlled, phase 2, proof-of-concept trial

Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;8(4):307–20

Etrasimod as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis (ELEVATE): Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies

Lancet. 2023;401(10383):1159–71

More articles on the topic