Esophagus to Small Intestine

Endoscopy. 2022;54(11):1023–31

van Wanrooij RLJ, Vanella G, Bronswijk M, de Gooyer P, Laleman W, van Malenstein H, Mandarino FV, Dell’Anna G, Fockens P, Arcidiacono PG, van der Merwe SW, Voermans RP

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy versus duodenal stenting for malignant gastric outlet obstruction: An international, multicenter, propensity score-matched comparison


Background: Endoscopic duodenal stenting is the current standard treatment for malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) in patients with limited life expectancy. However, duodenal stenting is prone to stent dysfunction. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is a novel technique with potentially superior stent patency. The authors compared clinical success, safety, and stent dysfunction of EUS-GE and duodenal stenting in patients with malignant GOO using propensity score matching.
Methods: This international, multicenter, retrospective study analyzed consecutive patients undergoing EUS-GE or duodenal stenting for GOO between 2015 and 2021 in 3 European centers. Primary outcomes were clinical success (GOO scoring system [GOOSS] ≥ 2) and stent dysfunction (GOOSS ≤ 1 after initial clinical success). A propensity score matching (1:1) analysis was performed using age, sex, underlying disease, disease stage, ascites, and peritoneal carcinomatosis as variables.
Results: 214 patients underwent EUS-GE (n = 107) or duodenal stenting (n = 107). After propensity score matching, 176 patients were matched and compared. Technical success rates for EUS-GE and duodenal stenting were 94% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 89–99%) versus 98% (95% CI: 95–100%), respectively (p = 0.44). Clinical success rates were 91% (95% CI: 85–97%) versus 75% (95% CI: 66–84%; p = 0.008). Stent dysfunction occurred in 1% (95% CI: 0–4%) versus 26% (95% CI: 15–37%) of patients (p < 0.001). Adverse event rate was 10% (95% CI: 4–17%) versus 21% (95% CI: 12–29%; p = 0.09).

Conclusion: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) had higher clinical success and lower stent dysfunction, with similar safety, compared with duodenal stenting, suggesting that EUS-GE may be preferred over duodenal stenting in patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction.

Dr. Dr. R.L.J. van Wanrooij, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,
E-Mail: rl.vanwanrooij@amsterdamumc.nl

DOI: 10.1055/a-1782-7568

Back to overview

this could be of interest:

Peroral endoscopic myotomy versus pneumatic dilation in treatment-naive patients with achalasia: 5-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial

Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;7(12):1103–11

Latiglutenase protects the mucosa and attenuates symptom severity in patients with celiac disease exposed to a gluten challenge

Gastroenterology. 2022;163(6):1510–21.e6

More articles on the topic