Colon to Rectum

Gastroenterology. 2023;165(6):1443–57

Peyrin-Biroulet L, Allegretti JR, Rubin DT, Bressler B, Germinaro M, Huang KH, Shipitofsky N, Zhang H, Wilson R, Han C, Feagan BG, Sandborn WJ, Panés J, Hisamatsu T, Lichtenstein GR, Sands BE, Dignass A; QUASAR Study Group

Guselkumab in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: QUASAR phase 2b induction study


Background and aims: The QUASAR phase 2b induction study evaluated the efficacy and safety of guselkumab, an interleukin-23p19 subunit antagonist, in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis with prior inadequate response and/or intolerance to corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, and/or advanced therapy.
Methods: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging, induction study, patients were randomized (1:1:1) to receive intravenous guselkumab 200 mg or 400 mg or placebo at weeks 0/4/8. The primary end point was clinical response (compared with baseline, modified Mayo score decrease ≥ 30% and ≥ 2 points, rectal bleeding subscore ≥ 1-point decrease or subscore of 0/1) at week 12. Guselkumab and placebo week-12 clinical non-responders received subcutaneous or intravenous guselkumab 200 mg, respectively, at weeks 12/16/20 (uncontrolled study period).
Results: The primary analysis population included patients with baseline modified Mayo scores ≥ 5 and ≤ 9 (intravenous guselkumab 200 mg, n = 101; 400 mg, n = 107; placebo, n = 105). Week-12 clinical response percentage was greater with guselkumab 200 mg (61.4%) and 400 mg (60.7%) versus placebo (27.6%; both p < 0.001). Greater proportions of guselkumab-treated versus placebo-treated patients achieved all major secondary end points (clinical remission, symptomatic remission, endoscopic improvement, histo-endoscopic mucosal improvement, and endoscopic normalization) at week 12. Among guselkumab week-12 clinical non-responders, 54.3% and 50.0% of patients in the 200- and 400-mg groups, respectively, achieved clinical response at week 24. Safety was similar among guselkumab and placebo groups.

Conclusions: Guselkumab intravenous induction was effective versus placebo in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. Guselkumab was safe, and efficacy and safety were similar between guselkumab dose groups.

Prof. Dr. A. Dignass, Medizinische Klinik I, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, E-Mail: axel.dignass@agaplesion.de

DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.08.038

Back to overview

this could be of interest:

Impact of submucosal saline injection during cold snare polypectomy for colorectal polyps sized 3–9 mm: A multicenter randomized controlled trial

Am J Gastroenterol. 2023;118(10):1848–54

Bile acid sequestrants in microscopic colitis: Clinical outcomes and utility of bile acid testing

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;21(12):3125–31.e2

More articles on the topic