Liver and Bile

Hepatology. 2024;79(1):49–60

Campani C, Vallot A, Ghannouchi H, Allaire M, Evain M, Sultanik P, Sidali S, Blaise L, Thabut D, Nahon P, Seror O, Ganne-Carrié N, Nault JC, Wagner M, Sutter O

Impact of radiological response and pattern of progression in patients with HCC treated by atezolizumab-bevacizumab


Background and aims: The authors aim to assess the role of radiological response to atezolizumab-bevacizumab in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to predict overall survival.
Approach and results: They retrospectively included patients with HCC treated by atezolizumab-bevacizumab in 2 tertiary centers. A retrospective blinded analysis was performed by 2 radiologists to assess Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST 1.1) and modified RECIST (mRECIST) criteria at 12 weeks. Imaging response and treatment decisions in the multidisciplinary tumor board at 12 weeks were registered. Among 125 patients, 9.6% and 20.8% had a response, 39.2% and 35.2% had stable disease, and 51.2% and 44% had progression, according to RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST, respectively, with a substantial interobserver agreement (k coefficient = 0.79). Metastasis was independently associated with a higher risk of progression. Patients classified as responders did not reach median survival, which was 16.2 and 15.9 months for patients classified as stable and 9.1 and 9.0 months for patients classified as progressors, in RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST criteria, respectively. The authors observed a wide variability in the identification of progression in the multidisciplinary tumor board in clinical practice compared with the blind evaluation by radiologists mainly due to discrepancy in the evaluation of the increase in size of intrahepatic lesions. The appearance of new extrahepatic lesions or vascular invasion lesions was associated with a worse overall survival (p = 0.032).

Conclusions: RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST criteria predict overall survival with more responders identified by mRECIST and the appearance of new extrahepatic lesion or vascular invasion was associated with a poor prognosis. A noticeable discrepancy was observed between patients classified as progressors at reviewing and the decision reached during the multidisciplinary tumor board.

Prof. Dr. J.-C. Nault, Liver Unit, Avicenne Hospital, Bobigny, France, E-Mail: naultjc@gmail.com

DOI: 10.1097/hep.0000000000000636

Back to overview

this could be of interest:

Lack of complete biochemical response in autoimmune hepatitis leads to adverse outcome: First report of the IAIHG retrospective registry

Hepatology. 2024;79(3):538–50

A phase 3, randomized, controlled trial of resmetirom in NASH with liver fibrosis

N Engl J Med. 2024;390(6):497–509

More articles on the topic